|
|
Post by sahearniitth on May 6, 2008 11:51:48 GMT -5
Should we put Tinchi on probation for selective attendence. I have had misc complaints from people about how he doesnt attend much besides Valk/Tav. I think Tinchi has mentioned that he cant make Sundays due to work (or some RL commitment) before. However a look at his history here www.ffxi.us/rbdb/viewmember.php?s=&name=Tinchishows he doesnt really attend much besides Valk/Tav/Windy (or hasnt in last 6-8 months) where he compettiivelly bids each time (and also which he attends fairlly consistentlly). |
|
|
|
Post by Aceris on May 6, 2008 16:24:08 GMT -5
Well not being able to attend Sundays and just showing up randomly on select Wednesdays for a run you need to bid stuff on is not the same thing. Now I'm not sure we have enough evidence to build a case against him for selective attendence but one thing's for sure, how we handle Tinchi will set a precedent for all future assholes who attempts to pull this kind of shit. Being that our current "probation rule" does not include selective attendence as a stipulation, I'd hugely recommend quickly/efficiently amending that part of the rules to include it. I"d leave it for discussion for a week or less then deal with Tinchi regarding it. Otherwise it just seems kinda out of place to just place Tinchi on probation without any kinda prior notice and what not to the member base.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aceris on May 6, 2008 16:35:34 GMT -5
If you guys want a more "immediate solution" to the problem, I'd recommend that one of us SHs straight out tell/send Tinchi a messege to either attempt to attend more Wednesday runs or he'll be put on immediate probation for selective attendence. Either way though I HIGHLY recommend amending the rules as soon as we decide on a course of action.
|
|
|
|
Post by sahearniitth on May 6, 2008 17:04:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Aceris on May 6, 2008 21:32:34 GMT -5
While I still don't see a finite punishment for selective attendence from either thread, since it's stated in the general rules/guidelines he's subject to the 2 warning and kick rule we always have been dealing out. So dish out his first warning and tell him he'll be subject to immediate probation.
|
|
|
|
Post by sahearniitth on Jun 12, 2008 10:37:58 GMT -5
Tagging this here even though it doesnt concern selective attendence but concerns Tinchi.
There was a complaint from Ali concerning Tinchi repeatedlly bidding on SMN as sublot 70 while still bidding on BLM as sublot 70. I think Tinchi is just dumb in that regard and doesnt realize that what he is doing is wrong. I have PM'd him after the last complaint but he hasnt checked it atm. Someone please mention it to him ingame if I am not around next time he is at a run.
The second is more serious. Tinchi decided to AFK without notice during Qufim at the MB pull. This caused issues since he was passed party leader and was supposed to add a BRD. While not ENTIRELLY his fault (since he wasnt the original pty leader and whoever passed him leader should have checked to make sure he was there) its still unacceptable behaviour to AFK at the few critical points during a run without notice. I told Tinchi clearlly that if I see him AFKing often or during critical points without notice for whatever reason (he said he needed to WC) I would be putting him at the bottom of entry for CoP runs since those are the majority of what he attends.
|
|
